18.104.22.168 The Need for Compromise on Public Spending
As described above, collectivists prefer governments to play a greater role, and therefore spend more, than individualists want. Government cannot continue to function without an agreed budget, though, so a compromise agreement must be reached. The difficulty of reaching that compromise has been vividly illustrated recently, as described in the BBC article: US government shutdown: How did we get here?.
The negotiations are political, as discussed later (6.7.1), but they should take account of economic factors:
- There is a limit on how much tax can be raised (22.214.171.124), determining how much government spending is economically sustainable.
- And tax income fluctuates across the economic cycle, so affordability must be assessed over the long term; the government has to be able to repay some debts during the good times, so that it can afford to borrow in the bad times – and avoid an ever-increasing level of government debt which would be a burden for taxpayers in later years (126.96.36.199).
- Value for money, rather than ideology, should determine the choice of public service providers – as analysed below (3.5.3).
This is a current page, from the Patterns of Power Edition 3a book, © PatternsofPower.org, 2020. An archived copy of it is held at https://www.patternsofpower.org/edition03/3523.htm