(The latest version of this page is at Pattern Descriptions. An archived copy of this page is held at https://www.patternsofpower.org/edition02/7465.htm)
The use of mercenaries, or defence contractors, is a type of defence spending which raises different contentious issues:
· Mercenaries might not be trained to the same standard as full-time troops and might create problems.
· Their legal accountability may be unclear.[1]
· The population feels less concern about them than about ‘our boys’.
Overall there is a feeling that defence contractors are less accountable to governance than full-time troops.
Another way of subcontracting military action is to provide economic and technical assistance to another country which is fighting the same enemy. This might be seen as a form of alliance. Again, the force would not be subject to the rules which apply in the country giving the assistance; any bad behaviour by the troops would reflect badly on both their own country and on any other countries which were seen to be allied with them. For example the secret rendition of prisoners in the ‘war against terrorism’, to be tortured in another country, damaged America's reputation (7.2.4.1).
© PatternsofPower.org, 2014
[1] An Economist article on 11 October 2007, entitled Blackwater in hot water, noted that the American private military company Blackwater had used aggressive tactics and that such companies “are formally immune from Iraqi law yet are rarely disciplined by the Western governments that employ them”. The article was available in May 2014 at http://www.economist.com/node/9954491.