2.8.3 Limits on Power: Degrees of Authority

(This is a current page, from the Patterns of Power Edition 3 book contents.  An archived copy of this page is held at http://www.patternsofpower.org/edition03/283.htm)

There are some interconnected terms which can cause confusion:

  • The term ‘authority’ is taken here to mean the power to decide, to command and to enforce obedience.
  • ‘Autonomy’ is taken as describing an authority’s degree of independence from a requirement to defer to others.
  • ‘Sovereignty’ is taken here as describing a State’s autonomy, coupled with a measure of the breadth of control that it exerts in the different dimensions of power.

None of these is ever totally unconstrained, as illustrated by some examples of the checks upon their power:

  • Power might be constrained by higher levels of authority where that is relevant: as in a political hierarchy, for example.
  • There are always practical limits, imposed by geography and the forces of nature.
  • Some authorities may be constrained by prior agreements reached with their peers, as is the case with trading agreements and treaties for example.
  • Some types of power do not lend themselves to being managed by a single authority and they transcend political boundaries: for example, the commercial power exercised by large corporations, the influence of religious leaders, and the impact of social media.

All authority is also, to some extent, limited by its ability to enforce compliance – which is directly related to whether people find it acceptable and/or see it as legitimate.

© PatternsofPower.org, 2014

Back 

Next