3.2.4.1   Progressive and Regressive Taxation    

 (The latest version of this page is at Pattern Descriptions.  An archived copy of this page is held at https://www.patternsofpower.org/edition02/3241.htm)

Some taxes are designed to be levied at a higher percentage upon those who have greater wealth in that category: they are €˜progressive€™.  Income taxes, for example, tend to be progressive: they typically take the form of allowing all income below a certain threshold to be free of tax and then taxing the remainder.  Most governments have implemented a more than minimally progressive system of income tax: applying a higher tax rate as incomes exceed a further threshold, on the principle that the rich can afford to pay even more €“ as in the example illustrated below, which rises from 0% to 20% to 40%.


Some other taxes affect the wealthy more than the poor, such as taxes on land[1], property, inheritance and capital gains; and Thomas Piketty has suggested that a €œprogressive global tax on capital€ could be levied.[2]

By contrast, purchase taxes (including value-added tax) tend to be €˜regressive€™ on many commodities because poorer people spend a higher proportion of their incomes on basic requirements. 

Purchase taxes can, though, be precisely targeted: for example it may be deemed politically more acceptable to levy higher rates of tax on luxuries or on products which can be harmful to health.

Tax is neither progressive nor regressive in a €˜flat tax€™ system, but is directly proportional to wealth.  Its proponents argue that it stimulates growth by avoiding €˜penalising€™ high earners; it can also avoid the distortions of special allowances and is cheaper to collect.[3]

Š PatternsofPower.org, 2014



[1] Land tax is not widely used (though Hong Kong, Singapore and Denmark use it) but it is easy to administer and is a progressive tax: one that affects wealthy people more than poorer ones.  This, and other information, appeared in an April 2010 article by Philippe LeGrain in Prospect that was entitled Tax the ground they walk on.  For subscribers it was available in April 2014 at http://www.prospectmagazine.co.uk/2010/03/tax-the-ground-they-walk-on-2/.

[2] Thomas Piketty proposed the €œutopian idea€ of a €œprogressive global tax on capital€ in chapter 15 of his book Capital in the Twenty-First Century, according to an overview of the book published by The Economist on 25 April 2014, entitled Reading "Capital": Part 4, Conclusion, and recap, which was available then at http://www.economist.com/node/21601214

[3] As one of many examples of the arguments for a €˜flat tax€™ system that are available on the Internet, a short article was downloadable in April 2014 from http://www.heritage.org/research/reports/2005/07/a-brief-guide-to-the-flat-tax.